北京理加联合科技有限公司

LICA United Technology Limited

服务热线: 13910499761 010-51292601
企业邮箱
应用支持 Application Support
News 应用支持

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

日期: 2019-03-19
浏览次数: 335

M.K. Maid1*

, R.R. Deshmukh2

1*Department of CS and IT, Dr. B. A. M. U, Aurangabad, India

2Department of CS and IT, Dr. B. A. M. U, Aurangabad, India

*Corresponding Author: mm915monali@gmail.com 

Available online at: www.ijcseonline.org 


Abstract— Remote Sensing has wide range of applications in many different fields. Remote Sensing has been found to be a valuable tool in evaluation, monitoring, and management of land, water and crop resources. The applications of remote sensing techniques in the field of agriculture are wide and varied ranging from crop identification, detection of disease on different crops & predicting grain yield of crops. Many remote sensing applications are devoted to the agricultural sector. The selected applications are put in the context of the global challenges the agricultural sector is facing: minimizing the environmental impact, while increasing production and productivity. The application of remote sensing in agriculture typically involves measuring reflectance of electromagnetic radiation in the visible (390 to 770 nm), near-infrared (NIR, 770 to 1,300 nm), or middle-infrared (1,300 to 2,500 nm) ranges using spectrometers. This paper reviews the concept of hyperspectral remote sensing, use of remote sensing in terms of agriculture field, study of diseased wheat leaves using hyperspectral remote sensing.


Keywords—Remote Sensing, Wheat Leaf Rust, Vegetation Indices, ASD Fieldspec4 Spectroradiometer.

I. INTRODUCTION

Remote sensing refers to the activities of  recording/observing/perceiving (sensing) objects or events at  far away (remote) places. Remote sensing is a sub-field of  geography. In modern usage, the term generally refers to the use of aerial sensor technologies to detect and classify objects on Earth (both on the surface, and in the atmosphere and oceans) by means of propagated signals (e.g. electromagnetic radiation) [1]. The electromagnetic radiation is normally used as an information carrier in remote sensing. The reflection of that energy by earth surface materials is then measured to produce an image of the area sensed. Generally, Remote sensing can be done on two types of data namely imagery and non imagery. It can be done using different kinds of remote sensing devices like ASD fieldspec Spectroradiometer. Remote sensing have wide range of applications in various fields, among which Agriculture plays important role in our day to day life as not only in india but in many countries agriculture is their primary source of income and all human beings, animals and many industries are dependent on agriculture field. agriculture plays key macroeconomic roles in the 

industrialization of developing countries by relieving saving, aggregate demand, fiscal, and foreign exchange constraints on the industrial sector [2].

 In agriculture field winter wheat is one of the highest yielding crops on the farm [3]. Different climatic factors and disease symptoms affects the plant growth and it directly results in yield of crop. Rust are among the most important 

fungal diseases of wheat worldwide [4]. There are three types of rust diseases in wheat crop: Strip Rust, Leaf Rust, Stem Rust.

Wheat rusts are caused by three related fungi [5]: 

• Stripe rust is caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici.

• Leaf rust is caused by Puccinia triticina.

• Stem rust is caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici.

This paper reviews the study of wheat leaf rust (WLR) disease using hyperspectral analysis, different vegetation indices and spectral signatures can be used to estimate the features of diseased and healthy crop. In this review paper ASD Fieldspec4 Spectroradiometer is used for data collection of diseased wheat leaves and healthy wheat leaves. Using different vegetation indices (VIs) biophysical and biochemical properties of crop can be estimated. 

II. BASICS OF REMOTE SENSING

Hyperspectral remote sensing is used for over 100 years for analysis of various objects and their chemical as well as biological composition. But hyperspectral sensor offers an alternate and nondestructive technique for analysis of 

physical and chemical properties of material. Remote sensing of vegetation is mainly performed by obtaining the electromagnetic wave reflectance information from canopies using passive sensors. It is well known that the reflectance of 

light spectra from plants changes with plant type, water content within tissues, and other intrinsic factors [6].

The reflectance from vegetation to the electromagnetic spectrum (spectral reflectance or emission characteristics of vegetation) is determined by chemical and morphological characteristics of the surface of organs or leaves [7]. 

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

The main applications for remote sensing of vegetation are based on the following light spectra: (i) the ultraviolet region (UV), which goes from 10 to 380 nm; (ii) the visible spectra, which are composed of the blue (450–495 nm), green (495−570 nm), and red (620–750 nm) wavelength regions; and (iii) the near and mid infrared band (850–1700 nm)[9,10].

III. HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING IN AGRICULTURE

Spectral data at the leaf and canopy scales have been utilized to improve the plant disease detection techniques from remotely sensed observations [11,12], where the visible and infrared regions are more sensitive to disease development [13]. The measured spectra can be utilized to early detection of fungus disease. Moreover, the optimized narrow bands vegetation indices were employed to discriminate various disease of wheat [14]. 

III.I Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease

The wheat rust is an important crop disease which has three types, i.e., wheat yellow rust (WYR), wheat leaf rust (WLR),and wheat stem rust [15]. 

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

WYR disease is identified by a single symptom which occurs as a narrow yellow stripes parallel to nervures on the leaf, whereas WLR disease is caused by the Puccinia triticina fungus and illustrates numerous symptoms simultaneously in various parts of an infected leaf [16]. The WLR symptoms vary from leaf to leaf but it presents a yellow color earlier, then its changes to orange and dark brown. Finally, the disease symptom ends with the dry leaf [17].

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

The effect of a disease on the pigments and structure of a plant and the change in their spectral responses enable spectroradiometry and remote sensing techniques to detect plant disease effectively [18].

Crop disease can cause significant yield loss and reduction of grain quality, which have a negative impact to food security around the world [19].

IV. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

IV.I Data Collection

Field spec 4 spectrometer (Analytical spectral device, ASD Co. USA) shown in following figure having parameter details in Table 1. Spectrum data export in ASCII text, then it can analyze spectrum data with different software like ASD View Spec Pro. Unscramble and MATLAB/ Octave [20].

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review


Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

V. VEGETATION INDICES FOR ESTIMATION OF WLRSYMPTOMS

Spectral data at different scales including leaf, canopy and landscape-level have been widely used to improve precision [21-24]. In recent years, researchers have studied various spectral vegetation indices (SVIs) to detect different 

vegetation diseases [24-26]. Efficient use of spectral data in detection of plant disease depends on the application. The spectral regions from 400 to 700 and 700 to 1100 are mainly influenced by leaf composition of pigments, structure, and 

water content [27]. The effect of a disease on the pigments and structure of a plant and the change in their spectral responses enable spectroradiometry and remote sensing techniques to detect plant disease effectively [28]. There are 

indices derived from reflectance values at several wavelengths that are able to detect and quantify the leaf content substances such as chlorophyll, anthocyanin, and water [29,30].

By using different types of vegetation indices estimation of biochemical and biophysical properties of crops is possible. Vegetation indices that are used by many researchers have shown in following table [31].


Table 2. Different Vegetation Indices

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

VI. CONCLUSION

As Remote Sensing technology growing rapidly in technological era and hyperspectral Remote sensing has wide number of applications not only in agriculture field but also in different industries which are dependent on agricultural area. With the help of different spectral characteristics like spectral signatures, vegetation indices, reflectance spectra we can use it for discrimination of crops. It can be used to study the severity of disease in crops, estimating the grain yield of crops, analysis and growth modulation of crop. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENT 

This work is supported by Dept. of Computer Science and Information Technology under the funds for Infrastructure under science and Technology (DST-FIST) with sanction no. SR/FST/ETI- 340/2013 to Dept. of Computer Science and Information Technology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India. The authors would like to thank Department and University Authorities for providing the infrastructure and necessary 

support for carrying out the research. 


REFERENCES

[1] A. Chitradevi, S. Vijayalakshmi, “Random Forest for Multitemporal and Multiscale Classification of Remote Sensing Satellite Imagery”, International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 4, Issue.2, pp.59-65, 2016.

[2] D. Souza, “Growth Complementarity Between Agriculture and Industry: Evidence from a Panel of Developing Countries”, 2014.

[3] G. Boyle, “The Winter Wheat Guide”, Teagasc, pp. 21-40, 2016.

[4] S. N. Wegulo, “Rust Diseases of Wheat”, NebGuide, 2012.

[5] S. Markell, G. Milus, R. Cartwright, J. Hedge, “Rust Diseases of Wheat”, Agriculture and natural resources.

[6] L. Chang, S. Peng-Sen, and Liu Shi-Rong, “A review of plant spectral reflectance response to water physiological changes,” Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 80–91, 2016.

[7] C. Zhang and J. M. Kovacs, “The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review,” Precision Agriculture, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 693–712, 2012.

[8] J. B Campbell, “Introduction to Remote Sensing”, Taylor and Francis, London, 1996. 

[9] H. R. Bin Abdul Rahim, M. Q. Bin Lokman, S. W. Harun, “Applied light-side coupling with optimized spiral-patterned zinc oxide nanorod coatings for multiple optical channel alcohol vapor sensing,” Journal of Nanophotonics, vol. 10, no. 3, Article ID 036009, 2016.

[10] B. A. Cruden, D. Prabhu, and R. Martinez, “Absolute radiation measurement in venus and mars entry conditions,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1069–1079, 2012.

[11] S. Sankaran, A. Mishra, R. Ehsani, and C. Davis, “A review of advanced techniques for detecting plant diseases,” Comput. Electron. Agriculture, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2010.

[12] C. Buschmann and E. Nagel, “In vivo spectroscopy and internal optics of leaves as basis for remote sensing of vegetation,” Int. J. Remote Sens, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 711–722, 1993.

[13] N. K. Poona and R. Ismail, “Using Boruta-selected spectroscopic wavebands for the asymptomatic detection of Fusarium circinatum stress,” IEEE J. Select. Topics Appl. Earth Observations Remote Sens., vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 3764–3772, 2014.

[14] W. Huang, “New optimized spectral indices for identifying and monitoring winter wheat diseases,” IEEE J. Select. Topics Appl. Earth Observations Remote Sens., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 2516–2524, 2014.

[15] M. D. Bolton, J. A. Kolmer, and D. F. Garvin, “Wheat leaf rust caused by Puccinia triticina,” Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 563–575, 2008.

[16] C. Robert, M.-O. Bancal, B. Ney, and C. Lannou, “Wheat leaf photosynthesis loss due to leaf rust, with respect to lesion development and leaf nitrogen status,” New Phytologist, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 227–241, 2005.

[17] D. Ashourloo, H. Aghighi, A. A. Matkan, M. R. Mobasheri, and A. M. Rad, “An Investigation Into Machine Learning Regression Techniques For The Leaf Rust Disease Detection Using Hyperspectral Measurement”, IEEE journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing, vol. 9, pp. 4344 – 4351, 2016.

[18] J.C. Zhang, R.L. Pu, J.H.Wang, W.J. Huang, L.Yuan, J.H. Luo, “Detecting powdery mildew of winter wheat using leaf level hyperspectral measurements”, Comput. Electron. Agric, pp. 13–23, 2012.

[19] R. N. Strange, P. R. Scott, “Plant Disease: A threat to global food security”, Annual reviews phytopathol, vol. 43, pp. 83-116, 2005.

[20] R. M. Misal, R. R. Deshmukh, “Application of Near-Infrared Spectrometer in Agro-Food Analysis: A Review”, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 141 No.7, pp. 0975 – 8887, 2016.

[21] H.D Roelofsen, P. M. van Bodegom, L. Kooistra, , J. P.M. Witte, “Trait estimation in herbaceous plant assemblages from in situ canopy spectra” Remote Sens., Vol. 5, pp. 6323–6345, 2013.

[22] S. Delalieux, A. Auwerkerken, V.W. Verstraeten, B. Somers, R.Valcke, S.Lhermitte, J. Keulemanss, P. Coppin, “Hyperspectral reflectance and fluorescence imaging to detect scab induced stress in Apple leaves”, Remote Sens, Vol. 1, pp. 858–874, 2009.

[23] U. Steiner, K. Bürling, E.C. Oerke, “Sensor use in plant protection”, Gesunde Pflanz, Vol. 60, pp. 131–141, 2008. 

[24] J.C. Zhang, R.L. Pu, J.H.Wang, W.J. Huang, L.Yuan, J .Wang, “Using in-situ hyperspectral data for detecting and discriminating yellow rust disease from nutrient stresse”,Field Crops Res., Vol. 134, pp.165–174,2012.

[25] C.Hillnhütter, A.K. Mahlein, R.A. Sikora, E.C. Oerke, “Remote sensing to detect plant stress induced by Heterodera schachtii and Rhizoctonia solani in sugar beet fields”, Field Crops Res., Vol. 122, pp. 70–77, 2011. 

[26] D. Moshou, C. Bravo, J. West, S. Wahlen, A. McCartney, H. Ramon, “Automatic detection of ―yellow rust‖ in wheat using reflectance measurements and neural networks”, Comput. Electron. Agric, Vol. 44, pp. 173–188, 2004.

[27] A.K. Mahlein, T. Rumpf, P. Welke, H.W. Dehne, L. Plümer, U. Steiner, E.C. Oerke, “Development of spectral indices for detecting and identifying plant diseases”, Remote Sens. Environ, Vol. 128, pp. 21–30, 2013. 

[28] J.C. Zhang, R.L. Pu, J.H.Wang, W.J. Huang, L. Yuan, J.H. Luo, “Detecting powdery mildew of winter wheat using leaf level13–23, 2012. 

[29] A.A. Gitelson, Y.J. Kaufman, R. Stark, D. Rundquist, “Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction”, Remote Sens. Environ, Vol.80, pp. 76–87, 2002. 

[30] J. Penuelas, F. Baret, I. Filella, “Semiempirical indices to assess carotenoids/chlorophyll a ratio from leaf spectral reflectance”, Photosynthetica, Vol. 31, pp. 221–230, 1995. 

[31] P. V. Janse, R. R. Deshmukh, “Hyperspectal Remote Sensing for Agriculture: A Review”, International Journal of Computer Applications,Vol.172 No.7, pp. 0975 – 8887, 2017.

[32] A. R. Huete, B. K. Liu, L. Van, “A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 59, pp. 440-451, 1997. 

[33] J.W. Rouse, R.H. Haas, J.A. Schell, D.W. Deering, “Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS, Third ERTS symposium”, NASA SP-351, NASA Washington, DC, Vol. 1, pp. 309-317, 1973. 

[34] C.F. Jorden, “Leaf area index from quality of light on the forest floor”, Ecology, Vol. 50(4), pp. 663-666, 1969. 

[35] B. Gao, “NDWI: A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 58, pp. 257-266, 1996. 

[36] J. Penuelas, J. Pinol, R. Ogaya, I. Lilella, “Estimation of plant water content by the reflectance water index WI (R900/ R970)”, International journal of remote sensing, Vol. 18, pp. 2869-2875, 1997. 

[37] Y. J. Kaufman, D. Tanier, “Atmospherically resistant vegetation index (ARVI) for EOS-MODIS”, IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 30(2), pp. 261-270, 1992. 

[38] A.R. Huete, “A soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 71, pp. 158-182, 2000. 

[39] A.A. Gitelson, Y. J. Kaufman, R. Stark, D. Rundquist, “Novel algorithm for remote estimation of vegetation fraction”, Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 80, pp. 76-87, 2002. 

[40] J. Penuelas, F. Baret, I. Filella, “Semi empirical indices to assess carotenoids/ chlorophyll a ratio from leaf spectral reflectance”, Photosynthetica, Vol. 31, pp. 221-230, 1995. 

[41] G. A. Blackburn, “Spectral indices for estimating photosynthetic pigment concentration: A test using senescent tree leaves”, International journal of remote sensing, Vol. 19, pp. 657-675, 1998. 

[42] G. A. Blackburn, “Quantifying chlorophyll and carotenoids from leaf to canopy scale: An evaluation of some hyperspectral approaches”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 66, pp. 273-285, 1998. 

[43] M. N. Merzlyak, A. A. Gitelson, O. B. Chivkunova, Y. Ratikin, “Nondestructive optical detection of pigment changes during leaf senescent and fruit ripening”, Physiologia Plantarum, Vol. 105, pp. 135-141, 1999. 

[44] M. S. Kim, “The use of narrow spectral bands for improving remote sensing estimation of fractionally absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fAPAR)”, Master Thesis, Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, 1994. 

[45] C. S. T. Daughtry, C. L. Walthall, M. S. Kim, E. B. de Colstoun, J. E. McMurtrey, “Estimating corn leaf chlorophyll concentration from leaf and canopy reflectance”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 74, pp. 229-239, 2000. 

[46] A. A. Gitelson, G. P. Keydan, M. N. Merzlyak, “Three band model for noninvasive estimation of chlorophyll, carotenoids and anthocyanin contents in higher plant leaves”, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 33, L11402, 2006. 

[47] A. A. Gitelson, M. N. Merzlyak, O. B. Chivkunova, “Optical properties and non-destructive estimation of anthocyanin content in plant leaves”, Photochemistry and Photobiology, Vol. 74(1), pp. 38-45, 2001. 

[48] J. A. Gaman, J. S. Surfus, “Assessing leaf pigment content and activity with a reflectometer”, New Phytologist, Vol. 143, pp. 105-117, 1999. 

[49] A. K. Van Den Berg, T. D. Perkins, “Non-destructive estimation of anthocyanin content in autumn auger maple leaves”, Horticultural Science, vol. 40(3), pp. 685-685, 2005. 

[50] A. A. Gitelson, Y. Zur, O. B. Chivkunova, M. N. Merzlyak, “Assessing carotenoid content in plant leaves with reflectance spectroscopy, Photochemistry and Photobiology, Vol. 75(3), pp. 272-281, 2002. 

[51] A. R. Hunt, B. N. Rock, “Detection of changes in leaf water content using near- and middle-infrared reflectance”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 30, pp. 43-54, 1989. 

[52] B. N. Rock, J. E. Vogelmann, D. L. Williams, A. F. Vogelmann, T. Hoshizaki, “Detection of forest damage”, BioScience, Vol. 36(7), pp. 439-445, 1986. 

[53] J. A. Gamon, L. Serrano, J. S. Surfus, “The photochemical reflectance index: An optical indicator of photosynthetic radiation-use efficiency across species, functional types, and nutrient level”, Oecologia, Vol. 112, pp. 492-501, 1997. 

[54] D. N. H. Horler, M. Dockray, J. Barber, “The red-edge of plant leaf reflectance”, International journal of remote sensing, Vol. 4, pp. 273-288, 1983. 




News / 相关新闻 More
2026 - 03 - 17
研究背景随着全球气候变化及水体富营养化加剧,蓝藻及其他藻类爆发已成为全球关注的环境问题。这些藻华不仅干扰航运与娱乐,更严重的是,部分蓝藻会释放致命毒素,威胁人类和野生动物的健康。传统监测方法往往难以快速、准确地在大空间尺度上区分产毒与不产毒的蓝藻属种。而光谱成像技术通过获取植物光合色素的“特征指纹”,为解决这一难题提供了可能。然而,现有的遥感监测也面临挑战:(1)光谱库不足:卫星遥感依赖端元光谱库,但经验证的代表性蓝藻光谱数据稀缺;(2)水体干扰强:水深、浊度等光学参数复杂,影响大范围遥感反演精度;(3)培养与野外的差异:实验室藻类光谱难以完全还原自然生境下的真实特征;基于此,美国地质调查局(USGS)联合美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)利用高光谱显微镜成像系统,以俄勒冈州上克拉马斯湖的不同区域水体的蓝藻样品为研究对象,通过系统验证与野外采样相结合的方法,获取了不同蓝藻属在细胞尺度的高...
2026 - 03 - 17
研究背景在北半球,多年冻土覆盖了约22%的陆地面积,封存着全球陆地最大的土壤碳库。然而,在全球变暖的驱动下,多年冻土正面临快速退化的严峻挑战。一旦这些被长期封冻的古老碳库随冻土融化而释放入大气,将触发剧烈的温室效应正反馈,从而进一步加速气候变暖。因此,系统探明冻土区碳储量及其稳定性特征,不仅是厘清碳循环机制的关键,更为预测气候变暖背景下全球碳平衡的动态演变提供重要依据。基于此,哈尔滨师范大学臧淑英老师团队以中国东北大兴安岭高纬度多年冻土区南部边界为研究对象,通过机械钻探及物理化学分组法,研究了不同地表类型深层土壤碳的组分与稳定性。研究发表在《Permafrost and Periglacial Processes》期刊。结果发现,深层冻土(尤其是森林地带)富含高活性碳,面临极高的变暖释放风险。该研究为气候模型中冻土碳反馈机制提供了重要的实测数据支撑。为什么选择大兴安岭?1. 大兴安岭位于高...
2026 - 03 - 09
研究背景 氮素是水稻生长发育的关键元素,其利用效率备受关注。传统研究多聚焦于土壤氮流失,而忽视了植株地上部分的氮气损失。研究发现,水稻植株尤其在开花和灌浆后期,会排放大量氨气。这一时期,叶片中的叶绿体成分大量降解,产生大量的NH4+。谷氨酰胺合成酶(GS)通常促进氮的循环利用,但衰老过程中GS活性的下降会损害NH4+的同化能力,导致NH3挥发损失。叶片由绿变黄是灌浆期氮素再利用最直观的指标。那么,叶片变色的快慢是否可以预测氨挥发的多少?中国水稻研究所的王丹英老师团队联合华中农业大学和浙江大学等团队对此进行了深入探讨。相关成果发表在《The Crop Journal》期刊。研究以灌浆期不同叶片颜色变化特征的水稻品种为研究对象,采用15N同位素示踪结合动态流通室技术精准量化植株源氨挥发,并同步监测叶片颜色动态变化及关键生理指标。研究发现,水稻叶片颜色变化率与灌浆期氨挥发量呈极显著正相关,叶片变...
2026 - 03 - 09
研究背景在陆地生态系统的水循环中,蒸散是连接地表与大气水分和能量交换的关键途径。尤其对于农田生态系统而言,准确估算作物的实际蒸散量,不仅有助于理解作物水分利用效率,还能为农业水资源管理和干旱应对提供科学依据。然而,现有的估算方法却面临诸多挑战:(1)传统气象模型:理论基础扎实,但依赖完整的气象数据,且难以捕捉植被光合作用的生理过程;(2)遥感指标局限性:太阳诱导叶绿素荧光(SIF)虽能直接反映光合活性,但在水分胁迫下存在响应滞后;光化学反射指数(PRI)能灵敏跟踪短期胁迫响应,但鲜少被纳入机器学习模型中;因此,如何融合多源数据,利用深度学习挖掘气象与生理指标的协同价值,成为了提高实际蒸散量(ETc act)估算精度的新途径。近期,西北农林科技大学蔡焕杰老师的团队联合沈阳大学和石河子大学的团队在《Agricultural Water Management》期刊发表最新研究成果,该研究通过融合...
关闭窗口】【打印
Copyright ©2018-2023 北京理加联合科技有限公司
犀牛云提供企业云服务

北京理加联合科技有限公司

地址:北京市海淀区安宁庄东路18号光华创业园5号楼(生产研发)
          光华创业园科研楼四层
电话:13910499761 13910124070  010-51292601
传真:010-82899770-8014
邮箱:info@li-ca.com
邮编:100085

 



 


 


  • 您的姓名:
  • *
  • 公司名称:
  • *
  • 地址:
  • *
  • 电话:
  • *
  • 传真:
  • *
  • 电子邮箱:
  • *
  • 邮政编码:
  • *
  • 留言主题:
  • *
  • 详细说明:
  • *
在线留言
关注我们
  • 官方微信
  • 官方手机端
友情链接:
X
1

QQ设置

3

SKYPE 设置

4

阿里旺旺设置

等待加载动态数据...

等待加载动态数据...

5

电话号码管理

  • 010-51292601
6

二维码管理

等待加载动态数据...

等待加载动态数据...

展开