北京理加联合科技有限公司

LICA United Technology Limited

服务热线: 13910499761 010-51292601
企业邮箱
应用支持 Application Support
News 应用支持

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

日期: 2019-03-19
浏览次数: 364

M.K. Maid1*

, R.R. Deshmukh2

1*Department of CS and IT, Dr. B. A. M. U, Aurangabad, India

2Department of CS and IT, Dr. B. A. M. U, Aurangabad, India

*Corresponding Author: mm915monali@gmail.com 

Available online at: www.ijcseonline.org 


Abstract— Remote Sensing has wide range of applications in many different fields. Remote Sensing has been found to be a valuable tool in evaluation, monitoring, and management of land, water and crop resources. The applications of remote sensing techniques in the field of agriculture are wide and varied ranging from crop identification, detection of disease on different crops & predicting grain yield of crops. Many remote sensing applications are devoted to the agricultural sector. The selected applications are put in the context of the global challenges the agricultural sector is facing: minimizing the environmental impact, while increasing production and productivity. The application of remote sensing in agriculture typically involves measuring reflectance of electromagnetic radiation in the visible (390 to 770 nm), near-infrared (NIR, 770 to 1,300 nm), or middle-infrared (1,300 to 2,500 nm) ranges using spectrometers. This paper reviews the concept of hyperspectral remote sensing, use of remote sensing in terms of agriculture field, study of diseased wheat leaves using hyperspectral remote sensing.


Keywords—Remote Sensing, Wheat Leaf Rust, Vegetation Indices, ASD Fieldspec4 Spectroradiometer.

I. INTRODUCTION

Remote sensing refers to the activities of  recording/observing/perceiving (sensing) objects or events at  far away (remote) places. Remote sensing is a sub-field of  geography. In modern usage, the term generally refers to the use of aerial sensor technologies to detect and classify objects on Earth (both on the surface, and in the atmosphere and oceans) by means of propagated signals (e.g. electromagnetic radiation) [1]. The electromagnetic radiation is normally used as an information carrier in remote sensing. The reflection of that energy by earth surface materials is then measured to produce an image of the area sensed. Generally, Remote sensing can be done on two types of data namely imagery and non imagery. It can be done using different kinds of remote sensing devices like ASD fieldspec Spectroradiometer. Remote sensing have wide range of applications in various fields, among which Agriculture plays important role in our day to day life as not only in india but in many countries agriculture is their primary source of income and all human beings, animals and many industries are dependent on agriculture field. agriculture plays key macroeconomic roles in the 

industrialization of developing countries by relieving saving, aggregate demand, fiscal, and foreign exchange constraints on the industrial sector [2].

 In agriculture field winter wheat is one of the highest yielding crops on the farm [3]. Different climatic factors and disease symptoms affects the plant growth and it directly results in yield of crop. Rust are among the most important 

fungal diseases of wheat worldwide [4]. There are three types of rust diseases in wheat crop: Strip Rust, Leaf Rust, Stem Rust.

Wheat rusts are caused by three related fungi [5]: 

• Stripe rust is caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici.

• Leaf rust is caused by Puccinia triticina.

• Stem rust is caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici.

This paper reviews the study of wheat leaf rust (WLR) disease using hyperspectral analysis, different vegetation indices and spectral signatures can be used to estimate the features of diseased and healthy crop. In this review paper ASD Fieldspec4 Spectroradiometer is used for data collection of diseased wheat leaves and healthy wheat leaves. Using different vegetation indices (VIs) biophysical and biochemical properties of crop can be estimated. 

II. BASICS OF REMOTE SENSING

Hyperspectral remote sensing is used for over 100 years for analysis of various objects and their chemical as well as biological composition. But hyperspectral sensor offers an alternate and nondestructive technique for analysis of 

physical and chemical properties of material. Remote sensing of vegetation is mainly performed by obtaining the electromagnetic wave reflectance information from canopies using passive sensors. It is well known that the reflectance of 

light spectra from plants changes with plant type, water content within tissues, and other intrinsic factors [6].

The reflectance from vegetation to the electromagnetic spectrum (spectral reflectance or emission characteristics of vegetation) is determined by chemical and morphological characteristics of the surface of organs or leaves [7]. 

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

The main applications for remote sensing of vegetation are based on the following light spectra: (i) the ultraviolet region (UV), which goes from 10 to 380 nm; (ii) the visible spectra, which are composed of the blue (450–495 nm), green (495−570 nm), and red (620–750 nm) wavelength regions; and (iii) the near and mid infrared band (850–1700 nm)[9,10].

III. HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING IN AGRICULTURE

Spectral data at the leaf and canopy scales have been utilized to improve the plant disease detection techniques from remotely sensed observations [11,12], where the visible and infrared regions are more sensitive to disease development [13]. The measured spectra can be utilized to early detection of fungus disease. Moreover, the optimized narrow bands vegetation indices were employed to discriminate various disease of wheat [14]. 

III.I Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease

The wheat rust is an important crop disease which has three types, i.e., wheat yellow rust (WYR), wheat leaf rust (WLR),and wheat stem rust [15]. 

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

WYR disease is identified by a single symptom which occurs as a narrow yellow stripes parallel to nervures on the leaf, whereas WLR disease is caused by the Puccinia triticina fungus and illustrates numerous symptoms simultaneously in various parts of an infected leaf [16]. The WLR symptoms vary from leaf to leaf but it presents a yellow color earlier, then its changes to orange and dark brown. Finally, the disease symptom ends with the dry leaf [17].

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

The effect of a disease on the pigments and structure of a plant and the change in their spectral responses enable spectroradiometry and remote sensing techniques to detect plant disease effectively [18].

Crop disease can cause significant yield loss and reduction of grain quality, which have a negative impact to food security around the world [19].

IV. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

IV.I Data Collection

Field spec 4 spectrometer (Analytical spectral device, ASD Co. USA) shown in following figure having parameter details in Table 1. Spectrum data export in ASCII text, then it can analyze spectrum data with different software like ASD View Spec Pro. Unscramble and MATLAB/ Octave [20].

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review


Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

V. VEGETATION INDICES FOR ESTIMATION OF WLRSYMPTOMS

Spectral data at different scales including leaf, canopy and landscape-level have been widely used to improve precision [21-24]. In recent years, researchers have studied various spectral vegetation indices (SVIs) to detect different 

vegetation diseases [24-26]. Efficient use of spectral data in detection of plant disease depends on the application. The spectral regions from 400 to 700 and 700 to 1100 are mainly influenced by leaf composition of pigments, structure, and 

water content [27]. The effect of a disease on the pigments and structure of a plant and the change in their spectral responses enable spectroradiometry and remote sensing techniques to detect plant disease effectively [28]. There are 

indices derived from reflectance values at several wavelengths that are able to detect and quantify the leaf content substances such as chlorophyll, anthocyanin, and water [29,30].

By using different types of vegetation indices estimation of biochemical and biophysical properties of crops is possible. Vegetation indices that are used by many researchers have shown in following table [31].


Table 2. Different Vegetation Indices

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

VI. CONCLUSION

As Remote Sensing technology growing rapidly in technological era and hyperspectral Remote sensing has wide number of applications not only in agriculture field but also in different industries which are dependent on agricultural area. With the help of different spectral characteristics like spectral signatures, vegetation indices, reflectance spectra we can use it for discrimination of crops. It can be used to study the severity of disease in crops, estimating the grain yield of crops, analysis and growth modulation of crop. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENT 

This work is supported by Dept. of Computer Science and Information Technology under the funds for Infrastructure under science and Technology (DST-FIST) with sanction no. SR/FST/ETI- 340/2013 to Dept. of Computer Science and Information Technology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India. The authors would like to thank Department and University Authorities for providing the infrastructure and necessary 

support for carrying out the research. 


REFERENCES

[1] A. Chitradevi, S. Vijayalakshmi, “Random Forest for Multitemporal and Multiscale Classification of Remote Sensing Satellite Imagery”, International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 4, Issue.2, pp.59-65, 2016.

[2] D. Souza, “Growth Complementarity Between Agriculture and Industry: Evidence from a Panel of Developing Countries”, 2014.

[3] G. Boyle, “The Winter Wheat Guide”, Teagasc, pp. 21-40, 2016.

[4] S. N. Wegulo, “Rust Diseases of Wheat”, NebGuide, 2012.

[5] S. Markell, G. Milus, R. Cartwright, J. Hedge, “Rust Diseases of Wheat”, Agriculture and natural resources.

[6] L. Chang, S. Peng-Sen, and Liu Shi-Rong, “A review of plant spectral reflectance response to water physiological changes,” Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 80–91, 2016.

[7] C. Zhang and J. M. Kovacs, “The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review,” Precision Agriculture, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 693–712, 2012.

[8] J. B Campbell, “Introduction to Remote Sensing”, Taylor and Francis, London, 1996. 

[9] H. R. Bin Abdul Rahim, M. Q. Bin Lokman, S. W. Harun, “Applied light-side coupling with optimized spiral-patterned zinc oxide nanorod coatings for multiple optical channel alcohol vapor sensing,” Journal of Nanophotonics, vol. 10, no. 3, Article ID 036009, 2016.

[10] B. A. Cruden, D. Prabhu, and R. Martinez, “Absolute radiation measurement in venus and mars entry conditions,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1069–1079, 2012.

[11] S. Sankaran, A. Mishra, R. Ehsani, and C. Davis, “A review of advanced techniques for detecting plant diseases,” Comput. Electron. Agriculture, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2010.

[12] C. Buschmann and E. Nagel, “In vivo spectroscopy and internal optics of leaves as basis for remote sensing of vegetation,” Int. J. Remote Sens, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 711–722, 1993.

[13] N. K. Poona and R. Ismail, “Using Boruta-selected spectroscopic wavebands for the asymptomatic detection of Fusarium circinatum stress,” IEEE J. Select. Topics Appl. Earth Observations Remote Sens., vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 3764–3772, 2014.

[14] W. Huang, “New optimized spectral indices for identifying and monitoring winter wheat diseases,” IEEE J. Select. Topics Appl. Earth Observations Remote Sens., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 2516–2524, 2014.

[15] M. D. Bolton, J. A. Kolmer, and D. F. Garvin, “Wheat leaf rust caused by Puccinia triticina,” Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 563–575, 2008.

[16] C. Robert, M.-O. Bancal, B. Ney, and C. Lannou, “Wheat leaf photosynthesis loss due to leaf rust, with respect to lesion development and leaf nitrogen status,” New Phytologist, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 227–241, 2005.

[17] D. Ashourloo, H. Aghighi, A. A. Matkan, M. R. Mobasheri, and A. M. Rad, “An Investigation Into Machine Learning Regression Techniques For The Leaf Rust Disease Detection Using Hyperspectral Measurement”, IEEE journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing, vol. 9, pp. 4344 – 4351, 2016.

[18] J.C. Zhang, R.L. Pu, J.H.Wang, W.J. Huang, L.Yuan, J.H. Luo, “Detecting powdery mildew of winter wheat using leaf level hyperspectral measurements”, Comput. Electron. Agric, pp. 13–23, 2012.

[19] R. N. Strange, P. R. Scott, “Plant Disease: A threat to global food security”, Annual reviews phytopathol, vol. 43, pp. 83-116, 2005.

[20] R. M. Misal, R. R. Deshmukh, “Application of Near-Infrared Spectrometer in Agro-Food Analysis: A Review”, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 141 No.7, pp. 0975 – 8887, 2016.

[21] H.D Roelofsen, P. M. van Bodegom, L. Kooistra, , J. P.M. Witte, “Trait estimation in herbaceous plant assemblages from in situ canopy spectra” Remote Sens., Vol. 5, pp. 6323–6345, 2013.

[22] S. Delalieux, A. Auwerkerken, V.W. Verstraeten, B. Somers, R.Valcke, S.Lhermitte, J. Keulemanss, P. Coppin, “Hyperspectral reflectance and fluorescence imaging to detect scab induced stress in Apple leaves”, Remote Sens, Vol. 1, pp. 858–874, 2009.

[23] U. Steiner, K. Bürling, E.C. Oerke, “Sensor use in plant protection”, Gesunde Pflanz, Vol. 60, pp. 131–141, 2008. 

[24] J.C. Zhang, R.L. Pu, J.H.Wang, W.J. Huang, L.Yuan, J .Wang, “Using in-situ hyperspectral data for detecting and discriminating yellow rust disease from nutrient stresse”,Field Crops Res., Vol. 134, pp.165–174,2012.

[25] C.Hillnhütter, A.K. Mahlein, R.A. Sikora, E.C. Oerke, “Remote sensing to detect plant stress induced by Heterodera schachtii and Rhizoctonia solani in sugar beet fields”, Field Crops Res., Vol. 122, pp. 70–77, 2011. 

[26] D. Moshou, C. Bravo, J. West, S. Wahlen, A. McCartney, H. Ramon, “Automatic detection of ―yellow rust‖ in wheat using reflectance measurements and neural networks”, Comput. Electron. Agric, Vol. 44, pp. 173–188, 2004.

[27] A.K. Mahlein, T. Rumpf, P. Welke, H.W. Dehne, L. Plümer, U. Steiner, E.C. Oerke, “Development of spectral indices for detecting and identifying plant diseases”, Remote Sens. Environ, Vol. 128, pp. 21–30, 2013. 

[28] J.C. Zhang, R.L. Pu, J.H.Wang, W.J. Huang, L. Yuan, J.H. Luo, “Detecting powdery mildew of winter wheat using leaf level13–23, 2012. 

[29] A.A. Gitelson, Y.J. Kaufman, R. Stark, D. Rundquist, “Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction”, Remote Sens. Environ, Vol.80, pp. 76–87, 2002. 

[30] J. Penuelas, F. Baret, I. Filella, “Semiempirical indices to assess carotenoids/chlorophyll a ratio from leaf spectral reflectance”, Photosynthetica, Vol. 31, pp. 221–230, 1995. 

[31] P. V. Janse, R. R. Deshmukh, “Hyperspectal Remote Sensing for Agriculture: A Review”, International Journal of Computer Applications,Vol.172 No.7, pp. 0975 – 8887, 2017.

[32] A. R. Huete, B. K. Liu, L. Van, “A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 59, pp. 440-451, 1997. 

[33] J.W. Rouse, R.H. Haas, J.A. Schell, D.W. Deering, “Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS, Third ERTS symposium”, NASA SP-351, NASA Washington, DC, Vol. 1, pp. 309-317, 1973. 

[34] C.F. Jorden, “Leaf area index from quality of light on the forest floor”, Ecology, Vol. 50(4), pp. 663-666, 1969. 

[35] B. Gao, “NDWI: A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 58, pp. 257-266, 1996. 

[36] J. Penuelas, J. Pinol, R. Ogaya, I. Lilella, “Estimation of plant water content by the reflectance water index WI (R900/ R970)”, International journal of remote sensing, Vol. 18, pp. 2869-2875, 1997. 

[37] Y. J. Kaufman, D. Tanier, “Atmospherically resistant vegetation index (ARVI) for EOS-MODIS”, IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 30(2), pp. 261-270, 1992. 

[38] A.R. Huete, “A soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 71, pp. 158-182, 2000. 

[39] A.A. Gitelson, Y. J. Kaufman, R. Stark, D. Rundquist, “Novel algorithm for remote estimation of vegetation fraction”, Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 80, pp. 76-87, 2002. 

[40] J. Penuelas, F. Baret, I. Filella, “Semi empirical indices to assess carotenoids/ chlorophyll a ratio from leaf spectral reflectance”, Photosynthetica, Vol. 31, pp. 221-230, 1995. 

[41] G. A. Blackburn, “Spectral indices for estimating photosynthetic pigment concentration: A test using senescent tree leaves”, International journal of remote sensing, Vol. 19, pp. 657-675, 1998. 

[42] G. A. Blackburn, “Quantifying chlorophyll and carotenoids from leaf to canopy scale: An evaluation of some hyperspectral approaches”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 66, pp. 273-285, 1998. 

[43] M. N. Merzlyak, A. A. Gitelson, O. B. Chivkunova, Y. Ratikin, “Nondestructive optical detection of pigment changes during leaf senescent and fruit ripening”, Physiologia Plantarum, Vol. 105, pp. 135-141, 1999. 

[44] M. S. Kim, “The use of narrow spectral bands for improving remote sensing estimation of fractionally absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fAPAR)”, Master Thesis, Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, 1994. 

[45] C. S. T. Daughtry, C. L. Walthall, M. S. Kim, E. B. de Colstoun, J. E. McMurtrey, “Estimating corn leaf chlorophyll concentration from leaf and canopy reflectance”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 74, pp. 229-239, 2000. 

[46] A. A. Gitelson, G. P. Keydan, M. N. Merzlyak, “Three band model for noninvasive estimation of chlorophyll, carotenoids and anthocyanin contents in higher plant leaves”, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 33, L11402, 2006. 

[47] A. A. Gitelson, M. N. Merzlyak, O. B. Chivkunova, “Optical properties and non-destructive estimation of anthocyanin content in plant leaves”, Photochemistry and Photobiology, Vol. 74(1), pp. 38-45, 2001. 

[48] J. A. Gaman, J. S. Surfus, “Assessing leaf pigment content and activity with a reflectometer”, New Phytologist, Vol. 143, pp. 105-117, 1999. 

[49] A. K. Van Den Berg, T. D. Perkins, “Non-destructive estimation of anthocyanin content in autumn auger maple leaves”, Horticultural Science, vol. 40(3), pp. 685-685, 2005. 

[50] A. A. Gitelson, Y. Zur, O. B. Chivkunova, M. N. Merzlyak, “Assessing carotenoid content in plant leaves with reflectance spectroscopy, Photochemistry and Photobiology, Vol. 75(3), pp. 272-281, 2002. 

[51] A. R. Hunt, B. N. Rock, “Detection of changes in leaf water content using near- and middle-infrared reflectance”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 30, pp. 43-54, 1989. 

[52] B. N. Rock, J. E. Vogelmann, D. L. Williams, A. F. Vogelmann, T. Hoshizaki, “Detection of forest damage”, BioScience, Vol. 36(7), pp. 439-445, 1986. 

[53] J. A. Gamon, L. Serrano, J. S. Surfus, “The photochemical reflectance index: An optical indicator of photosynthetic radiation-use efficiency across species, functional types, and nutrient level”, Oecologia, Vol. 112, pp. 492-501, 1997. 

[54] D. N. H. Horler, M. Dockray, J. Barber, “The red-edge of plant leaf reflectance”, International journal of remote sensing, Vol. 4, pp. 273-288, 1983. 




News / 相关新闻 More
2026 - 04 - 20
在全球变化背景下,滨海盐沼因其较强的固碳潜力,被视为重要的“蓝碳”生态系统。然而,近三十年来,原产北美大西洋海岸的外来植物互花米草在我国沿海盐沼迅速蔓延,持续扰动湿地生态结构与生物地球化学过程,也让盐沼蓝碳功能面临新的不确定性。互花米草的扩张,究竟是在提升盐沼的固碳能力,还是在悄然削弱这一重要生态系统的调节功能?一项发表在《Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science》的研究给出了答案。 为什么这项研究值得关注?盐沼、红树林、海草床等滨海生态系统是应对气候变化的重要自然解决方案,凭借碳封存、岸线防护、生物多样性维持等核心服务发挥关键作用。互花米草作为全球性滨海入侵植物,在我国沿海大面积扩散,严重改变湿地结构与生物地球化学循环。现有研究表明,互花米草入侵在促进土壤碳积累的同时,也可能显著提升温室气体排放,进而抵消部分蓝碳效益。然而,不同入侵年限下甲烷(CH₄)与二...
2026 - 04 - 13
研究背景盐碱土高盐、高pH、高钠离子并存,在全球干旱半干旱区广泛分布。过量盐分破坏土壤结构,阻碍水分渗透与孔隙流通,有机质难以积累,养分供应受阻,土壤肥力随之下滑。更关键的是,盐碱环境对微生物活性和酶促反应的抑制作用十分显著,养分循环功能的受损,是这类土壤作物产量长期偏低的重要原因之一。有机肥料是改良盐碱地的有效途径,它不仅能补充有机质、改善土壤理化性状,还能重塑微生物群落结构。然而,有机–矿物肥料配施究竟如何影响盐碱土中的微生物群落与功能基因,目前仍缺乏清晰的机制认识。近期,西安理工大学段曼莉老师团队在《Frontiers in Microbiology》发表了一项研究,团队以新疆和田地区的盐碱土为研究对象,开展了高粱 苏丹草的盆栽施肥实验。通过设置不同比例的有机肥与矿质肥配施处理,结合16S rRNA基因测序和高通量qPCR技术,系统解析了土壤理化性质、细菌群落结构及碳(C)、氮(N)...
2026 - 04 - 07
农药精准施用的挑战霜霉病等真菌性病害是全球葡萄生产中的重要威胁。近140年来,铜基抗菌化合物一直是防治植物病原菌的重要手段。然而,在实际操作中因杀菌剂施用不当及农药飘移,不仅造成经济损失,还会引致农业土壤持续污染。当前,水敏纸仍是农药飘移评估的常用方法,但该方法已被证明难以精准表征农药在葡萄园的整体沉积状况。高光谱成像技术凭借非破坏性、信息维度丰富的优势,已成功应用于葡萄品种分类、果实成熟度与品质评估、冠层实时监测等领域,而利用该技术实现叶片表面农药沉积量的定量检测,仍是亟待深入研究的开放性课题。近期,西班牙布尔戈斯大学的研究团队在《Data》发表了一篇Data Descriptor,公开了一个包含372幅葡萄叶片高光谱图像的数据集。该数据集系统揭示了3种杀菌剂在不同浓度和施用条件下的光谱差异,可为精准农业中的农药沉积监测、定量分析以及机器学习模型构建提供重要的数据基础。 图1.机械工作台...
2026 - 04 - 07
研究背景人口增长和农业发展的需求推动氮肥大量施用,虽保障了粮食安全,却给水生环境带来巨大压力。氮肥过量施用后,硝酸盐会通过径流和淋溶作用向地表水体迁移,进而引发水体富营养化、藻类水华、地下水污染等问题。在农业小流域,硝酸盐的迁移主要受暴雨驱动的水文过程影响,暴雨会激活地表与浅层地下径流通道,让土壤快速饱和,进而加快硝酸盐经径流和淋溶向河网的迁移速度。现有研究虽证实了暴雨事件与硝酸盐迁移过程存在关联,但不同暴雨型态在事件尺度上对硝酸盐的具体调控机制,目前仍未明确。为此,华中农业大学史志华老师团队以丹江口库区农业小流域为研究对象,结合高频水文监测与稳定水同位素示踪法,完成20场暴雨事件的原位观测与样品分析,系统阐明不同暴雨峰值模式下硝酸盐的输出途径与规律,相关成果发表于国际权威期刊《Water Research》。该研究为解析暴雨结构对农业流域硝酸盐输出的调控作用提供了精准的数据支撑,在揭示水...
关闭窗口】【打印
Copyright ©2018-2023 北京理加联合科技有限公司
犀牛云提供企业云服务

北京理加联合科技有限公司

地址:北京市海淀区安宁庄东路18号光华创业园5号楼(生产研发)
          光华创业园科研楼四层
电话:13910499761 13910124070  010-51292601
传真:010-82899770-8014
邮箱:info@li-ca.com
邮编:100085

 



 


 


  • 您的姓名:
  • *
  • 公司名称:
  • *
  • 地址:
  • *
  • 电话:
  • *
  • 传真:
  • *
  • 电子邮箱:
  • *
  • 邮政编码:
  • *
  • 留言主题:
  • *
  • 详细说明:
  • *
在线留言
关注我们
  • 官方微信
  • 官方手机端
友情链接:
X
1

QQ设置

3

SKYPE 设置

4

阿里旺旺设置

等待加载动态数据...

等待加载动态数据...

5

电话号码管理

  • 010-51292601
6

二维码管理

等待加载动态数据...

等待加载动态数据...

展开