北京理加联合科技有限公司

LICA United Technology Limited

服务热线: 13910499761 010-51292601
企业邮箱
应用支持 Application Support
News 应用支持

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

日期: 2019-03-19
浏览次数: 399

M.K. Maid1*

, R.R. Deshmukh2

1*Department of CS and IT, Dr. B. A. M. U, Aurangabad, India

2Department of CS and IT, Dr. B. A. M. U, Aurangabad, India

*Corresponding Author: mm915monali@gmail.com 

Available online at: www.ijcseonline.org 


Abstract— Remote Sensing has wide range of applications in many different fields. Remote Sensing has been found to be a valuable tool in evaluation, monitoring, and management of land, water and crop resources. The applications of remote sensing techniques in the field of agriculture are wide and varied ranging from crop identification, detection of disease on different crops & predicting grain yield of crops. Many remote sensing applications are devoted to the agricultural sector. The selected applications are put in the context of the global challenges the agricultural sector is facing: minimizing the environmental impact, while increasing production and productivity. The application of remote sensing in agriculture typically involves measuring reflectance of electromagnetic radiation in the visible (390 to 770 nm), near-infrared (NIR, 770 to 1,300 nm), or middle-infrared (1,300 to 2,500 nm) ranges using spectrometers. This paper reviews the concept of hyperspectral remote sensing, use of remote sensing in terms of agriculture field, study of diseased wheat leaves using hyperspectral remote sensing.


Keywords—Remote Sensing, Wheat Leaf Rust, Vegetation Indices, ASD Fieldspec4 Spectroradiometer.

I. INTRODUCTION

Remote sensing refers to the activities of  recording/observing/perceiving (sensing) objects or events at  far away (remote) places. Remote sensing is a sub-field of  geography. In modern usage, the term generally refers to the use of aerial sensor technologies to detect and classify objects on Earth (both on the surface, and in the atmosphere and oceans) by means of propagated signals (e.g. electromagnetic radiation) [1]. The electromagnetic radiation is normally used as an information carrier in remote sensing. The reflection of that energy by earth surface materials is then measured to produce an image of the area sensed. Generally, Remote sensing can be done on two types of data namely imagery and non imagery. It can be done using different kinds of remote sensing devices like ASD fieldspec Spectroradiometer. Remote sensing have wide range of applications in various fields, among which Agriculture plays important role in our day to day life as not only in india but in many countries agriculture is their primary source of income and all human beings, animals and many industries are dependent on agriculture field. agriculture plays key macroeconomic roles in the 

industrialization of developing countries by relieving saving, aggregate demand, fiscal, and foreign exchange constraints on the industrial sector [2].

 In agriculture field winter wheat is one of the highest yielding crops on the farm [3]. Different climatic factors and disease symptoms affects the plant growth and it directly results in yield of crop. Rust are among the most important 

fungal diseases of wheat worldwide [4]. There are three types of rust diseases in wheat crop: Strip Rust, Leaf Rust, Stem Rust.

Wheat rusts are caused by three related fungi [5]: 

• Stripe rust is caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici.

• Leaf rust is caused by Puccinia triticina.

• Stem rust is caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici.

This paper reviews the study of wheat leaf rust (WLR) disease using hyperspectral analysis, different vegetation indices and spectral signatures can be used to estimate the features of diseased and healthy crop. In this review paper ASD Fieldspec4 Spectroradiometer is used for data collection of diseased wheat leaves and healthy wheat leaves. Using different vegetation indices (VIs) biophysical and biochemical properties of crop can be estimated. 

II. BASICS OF REMOTE SENSING

Hyperspectral remote sensing is used for over 100 years for analysis of various objects and their chemical as well as biological composition. But hyperspectral sensor offers an alternate and nondestructive technique for analysis of 

physical and chemical properties of material. Remote sensing of vegetation is mainly performed by obtaining the electromagnetic wave reflectance information from canopies using passive sensors. It is well known that the reflectance of 

light spectra from plants changes with plant type, water content within tissues, and other intrinsic factors [6].

The reflectance from vegetation to the electromagnetic spectrum (spectral reflectance or emission characteristics of vegetation) is determined by chemical and morphological characteristics of the surface of organs or leaves [7]. 

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

The main applications for remote sensing of vegetation are based on the following light spectra: (i) the ultraviolet region (UV), which goes from 10 to 380 nm; (ii) the visible spectra, which are composed of the blue (450–495 nm), green (495−570 nm), and red (620–750 nm) wavelength regions; and (iii) the near and mid infrared band (850–1700 nm)[9,10].

III. HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING IN AGRICULTURE

Spectral data at the leaf and canopy scales have been utilized to improve the plant disease detection techniques from remotely sensed observations [11,12], where the visible and infrared regions are more sensitive to disease development [13]. The measured spectra can be utilized to early detection of fungus disease. Moreover, the optimized narrow bands vegetation indices were employed to discriminate various disease of wheat [14]. 

III.I Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease

The wheat rust is an important crop disease which has three types, i.e., wheat yellow rust (WYR), wheat leaf rust (WLR),and wheat stem rust [15]. 

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

WYR disease is identified by a single symptom which occurs as a narrow yellow stripes parallel to nervures on the leaf, whereas WLR disease is caused by the Puccinia triticina fungus and illustrates numerous symptoms simultaneously in various parts of an infected leaf [16]. The WLR symptoms vary from leaf to leaf but it presents a yellow color earlier, then its changes to orange and dark brown. Finally, the disease symptom ends with the dry leaf [17].

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

The effect of a disease on the pigments and structure of a plant and the change in their spectral responses enable spectroradiometry and remote sensing techniques to detect plant disease effectively [18].

Crop disease can cause significant yield loss and reduction of grain quality, which have a negative impact to food security around the world [19].

IV. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

IV.I Data Collection

Field spec 4 spectrometer (Analytical spectral device, ASD Co. USA) shown in following figure having parameter details in Table 1. Spectrum data export in ASCII text, then it can analyze spectrum data with different software like ASD View Spec Pro. Unscramble and MATLAB/ Octave [20].

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review


Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

V. VEGETATION INDICES FOR ESTIMATION OF WLRSYMPTOMS

Spectral data at different scales including leaf, canopy and landscape-level have been widely used to improve precision [21-24]. In recent years, researchers have studied various spectral vegetation indices (SVIs) to detect different 

vegetation diseases [24-26]. Efficient use of spectral data in detection of plant disease depends on the application. The spectral regions from 400 to 700 and 700 to 1100 are mainly influenced by leaf composition of pigments, structure, and 

water content [27]. The effect of a disease on the pigments and structure of a plant and the change in their spectral responses enable spectroradiometry and remote sensing techniques to detect plant disease effectively [28]. There are 

indices derived from reflectance values at several wavelengths that are able to detect and quantify the leaf content substances such as chlorophyll, anthocyanin, and water [29,30].

By using different types of vegetation indices estimation of biochemical and biophysical properties of crops is possible. Vegetation indices that are used by many researchers have shown in following table [31].


Table 2. Different Vegetation Indices

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

VI. CONCLUSION

As Remote Sensing technology growing rapidly in technological era and hyperspectral Remote sensing has wide number of applications not only in agriculture field but also in different industries which are dependent on agricultural area. With the help of different spectral characteristics like spectral signatures, vegetation indices, reflectance spectra we can use it for discrimination of crops. It can be used to study the severity of disease in crops, estimating the grain yield of crops, analysis and growth modulation of crop. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENT 

This work is supported by Dept. of Computer Science and Information Technology under the funds for Infrastructure under science and Technology (DST-FIST) with sanction no. SR/FST/ETI- 340/2013 to Dept. of Computer Science and Information Technology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India. The authors would like to thank Department and University Authorities for providing the infrastructure and necessary 

support for carrying out the research. 


REFERENCES

[1] A. Chitradevi, S. Vijayalakshmi, “Random Forest for Multitemporal and Multiscale Classification of Remote Sensing Satellite Imagery”, International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 4, Issue.2, pp.59-65, 2016.

[2] D. Souza, “Growth Complementarity Between Agriculture and Industry: Evidence from a Panel of Developing Countries”, 2014.

[3] G. Boyle, “The Winter Wheat Guide”, Teagasc, pp. 21-40, 2016.

[4] S. N. Wegulo, “Rust Diseases of Wheat”, NebGuide, 2012.

[5] S. Markell, G. Milus, R. Cartwright, J. Hedge, “Rust Diseases of Wheat”, Agriculture and natural resources.

[6] L. Chang, S. Peng-Sen, and Liu Shi-Rong, “A review of plant spectral reflectance response to water physiological changes,” Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 80–91, 2016.

[7] C. Zhang and J. M. Kovacs, “The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review,” Precision Agriculture, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 693–712, 2012.

[8] J. B Campbell, “Introduction to Remote Sensing”, Taylor and Francis, London, 1996. 

[9] H. R. Bin Abdul Rahim, M. Q. Bin Lokman, S. W. Harun, “Applied light-side coupling with optimized spiral-patterned zinc oxide nanorod coatings for multiple optical channel alcohol vapor sensing,” Journal of Nanophotonics, vol. 10, no. 3, Article ID 036009, 2016.

[10] B. A. Cruden, D. Prabhu, and R. Martinez, “Absolute radiation measurement in venus and mars entry conditions,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1069–1079, 2012.

[11] S. Sankaran, A. Mishra, R. Ehsani, and C. Davis, “A review of advanced techniques for detecting plant diseases,” Comput. Electron. Agriculture, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2010.

[12] C. Buschmann and E. Nagel, “In vivo spectroscopy and internal optics of leaves as basis for remote sensing of vegetation,” Int. J. Remote Sens, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 711–722, 1993.

[13] N. K. Poona and R. Ismail, “Using Boruta-selected spectroscopic wavebands for the asymptomatic detection of Fusarium circinatum stress,” IEEE J. Select. Topics Appl. Earth Observations Remote Sens., vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 3764–3772, 2014.

[14] W. Huang, “New optimized spectral indices for identifying and monitoring winter wheat diseases,” IEEE J. Select. Topics Appl. Earth Observations Remote Sens., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 2516–2524, 2014.

[15] M. D. Bolton, J. A. Kolmer, and D. F. Garvin, “Wheat leaf rust caused by Puccinia triticina,” Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 563–575, 2008.

[16] C. Robert, M.-O. Bancal, B. Ney, and C. Lannou, “Wheat leaf photosynthesis loss due to leaf rust, with respect to lesion development and leaf nitrogen status,” New Phytologist, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 227–241, 2005.

[17] D. Ashourloo, H. Aghighi, A. A. Matkan, M. R. Mobasheri, and A. M. Rad, “An Investigation Into Machine Learning Regression Techniques For The Leaf Rust Disease Detection Using Hyperspectral Measurement”, IEEE journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing, vol. 9, pp. 4344 – 4351, 2016.

[18] J.C. Zhang, R.L. Pu, J.H.Wang, W.J. Huang, L.Yuan, J.H. Luo, “Detecting powdery mildew of winter wheat using leaf level hyperspectral measurements”, Comput. Electron. Agric, pp. 13–23, 2012.

[19] R. N. Strange, P. R. Scott, “Plant Disease: A threat to global food security”, Annual reviews phytopathol, vol. 43, pp. 83-116, 2005.

[20] R. M. Misal, R. R. Deshmukh, “Application of Near-Infrared Spectrometer in Agro-Food Analysis: A Review”, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 141 No.7, pp. 0975 – 8887, 2016.

[21] H.D Roelofsen, P. M. van Bodegom, L. Kooistra, , J. P.M. Witte, “Trait estimation in herbaceous plant assemblages from in situ canopy spectra” Remote Sens., Vol. 5, pp. 6323–6345, 2013.

[22] S. Delalieux, A. Auwerkerken, V.W. Verstraeten, B. Somers, R.Valcke, S.Lhermitte, J. Keulemanss, P. Coppin, “Hyperspectral reflectance and fluorescence imaging to detect scab induced stress in Apple leaves”, Remote Sens, Vol. 1, pp. 858–874, 2009.

[23] U. Steiner, K. Bürling, E.C. Oerke, “Sensor use in plant protection”, Gesunde Pflanz, Vol. 60, pp. 131–141, 2008. 

[24] J.C. Zhang, R.L. Pu, J.H.Wang, W.J. Huang, L.Yuan, J .Wang, “Using in-situ hyperspectral data for detecting and discriminating yellow rust disease from nutrient stresse”,Field Crops Res., Vol. 134, pp.165–174,2012.

[25] C.Hillnhütter, A.K. Mahlein, R.A. Sikora, E.C. Oerke, “Remote sensing to detect plant stress induced by Heterodera schachtii and Rhizoctonia solani in sugar beet fields”, Field Crops Res., Vol. 122, pp. 70–77, 2011. 

[26] D. Moshou, C. Bravo, J. West, S. Wahlen, A. McCartney, H. Ramon, “Automatic detection of ―yellow rust‖ in wheat using reflectance measurements and neural networks”, Comput. Electron. Agric, Vol. 44, pp. 173–188, 2004.

[27] A.K. Mahlein, T. Rumpf, P. Welke, H.W. Dehne, L. Plümer, U. Steiner, E.C. Oerke, “Development of spectral indices for detecting and identifying plant diseases”, Remote Sens. Environ, Vol. 128, pp. 21–30, 2013. 

[28] J.C. Zhang, R.L. Pu, J.H.Wang, W.J. Huang, L. Yuan, J.H. Luo, “Detecting powdery mildew of winter wheat using leaf level13–23, 2012. 

[29] A.A. Gitelson, Y.J. Kaufman, R. Stark, D. Rundquist, “Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction”, Remote Sens. Environ, Vol.80, pp. 76–87, 2002. 

[30] J. Penuelas, F. Baret, I. Filella, “Semiempirical indices to assess carotenoids/chlorophyll a ratio from leaf spectral reflectance”, Photosynthetica, Vol. 31, pp. 221–230, 1995. 

[31] P. V. Janse, R. R. Deshmukh, “Hyperspectal Remote Sensing for Agriculture: A Review”, International Journal of Computer Applications,Vol.172 No.7, pp. 0975 – 8887, 2017.

[32] A. R. Huete, B. K. Liu, L. Van, “A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 59, pp. 440-451, 1997. 

[33] J.W. Rouse, R.H. Haas, J.A. Schell, D.W. Deering, “Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS, Third ERTS symposium”, NASA SP-351, NASA Washington, DC, Vol. 1, pp. 309-317, 1973. 

[34] C.F. Jorden, “Leaf area index from quality of light on the forest floor”, Ecology, Vol. 50(4), pp. 663-666, 1969. 

[35] B. Gao, “NDWI: A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 58, pp. 257-266, 1996. 

[36] J. Penuelas, J. Pinol, R. Ogaya, I. Lilella, “Estimation of plant water content by the reflectance water index WI (R900/ R970)”, International journal of remote sensing, Vol. 18, pp. 2869-2875, 1997. 

[37] Y. J. Kaufman, D. Tanier, “Atmospherically resistant vegetation index (ARVI) for EOS-MODIS”, IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 30(2), pp. 261-270, 1992. 

[38] A.R. Huete, “A soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 71, pp. 158-182, 2000. 

[39] A.A. Gitelson, Y. J. Kaufman, R. Stark, D. Rundquist, “Novel algorithm for remote estimation of vegetation fraction”, Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 80, pp. 76-87, 2002. 

[40] J. Penuelas, F. Baret, I. Filella, “Semi empirical indices to assess carotenoids/ chlorophyll a ratio from leaf spectral reflectance”, Photosynthetica, Vol. 31, pp. 221-230, 1995. 

[41] G. A. Blackburn, “Spectral indices for estimating photosynthetic pigment concentration: A test using senescent tree leaves”, International journal of remote sensing, Vol. 19, pp. 657-675, 1998. 

[42] G. A. Blackburn, “Quantifying chlorophyll and carotenoids from leaf to canopy scale: An evaluation of some hyperspectral approaches”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 66, pp. 273-285, 1998. 

[43] M. N. Merzlyak, A. A. Gitelson, O. B. Chivkunova, Y. Ratikin, “Nondestructive optical detection of pigment changes during leaf senescent and fruit ripening”, Physiologia Plantarum, Vol. 105, pp. 135-141, 1999. 

[44] M. S. Kim, “The use of narrow spectral bands for improving remote sensing estimation of fractionally absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fAPAR)”, Master Thesis, Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, 1994. 

[45] C. S. T. Daughtry, C. L. Walthall, M. S. Kim, E. B. de Colstoun, J. E. McMurtrey, “Estimating corn leaf chlorophyll concentration from leaf and canopy reflectance”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 74, pp. 229-239, 2000. 

[46] A. A. Gitelson, G. P. Keydan, M. N. Merzlyak, “Three band model for noninvasive estimation of chlorophyll, carotenoids and anthocyanin contents in higher plant leaves”, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 33, L11402, 2006. 

[47] A. A. Gitelson, M. N. Merzlyak, O. B. Chivkunova, “Optical properties and non-destructive estimation of anthocyanin content in plant leaves”, Photochemistry and Photobiology, Vol. 74(1), pp. 38-45, 2001. 

[48] J. A. Gaman, J. S. Surfus, “Assessing leaf pigment content and activity with a reflectometer”, New Phytologist, Vol. 143, pp. 105-117, 1999. 

[49] A. K. Van Den Berg, T. D. Perkins, “Non-destructive estimation of anthocyanin content in autumn auger maple leaves”, Horticultural Science, vol. 40(3), pp. 685-685, 2005. 

[50] A. A. Gitelson, Y. Zur, O. B. Chivkunova, M. N. Merzlyak, “Assessing carotenoid content in plant leaves with reflectance spectroscopy, Photochemistry and Photobiology, Vol. 75(3), pp. 272-281, 2002. 

[51] A. R. Hunt, B. N. Rock, “Detection of changes in leaf water content using near- and middle-infrared reflectance”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 30, pp. 43-54, 1989. 

[52] B. N. Rock, J. E. Vogelmann, D. L. Williams, A. F. Vogelmann, T. Hoshizaki, “Detection of forest damage”, BioScience, Vol. 36(7), pp. 439-445, 1986. 

[53] J. A. Gamon, L. Serrano, J. S. Surfus, “The photochemical reflectance index: An optical indicator of photosynthetic radiation-use efficiency across species, functional types, and nutrient level”, Oecologia, Vol. 112, pp. 492-501, 1997. 

[54] D. N. H. Horler, M. Dockray, J. Barber, “The red-edge of plant leaf reflectance”, International journal of remote sensing, Vol. 4, pp. 273-288, 1983. 




News / 相关新闻 More
2026 - 06 - 08
研究背景海洋漂浮碎片是全球海洋环境治理中的重要污染问题。其在海面长期迁移和聚集,不仅威胁海洋生物与生态系统健康,也可能影响航运安全和近岸经济活动。由于漂浮碎片分布范围广、时空变化快,传统人工巡查、船舶观测和现场拍摄难以满足大范围、快速化监测需求。遥感技术为其监测提供了新路径,但不同材质碎片的光谱特征差异明显,且容易与背景海水和大型漂浮藻类混淆,限制了遥感识别的准确性与稳定性。基于此,南京信息工程大学孙德勇老师团队从多类型漂浮碎片的高光谱响应特征入手,结合卫星影像,构建了面向海洋漂浮碎片快速识别的遥感检测方法,为海洋污染监测、漂浮垃圾识别及海洋环境管理提供了新的技术支撑。相关成果发表在《Ecological Indicators》期刊。 图1. (a) 实验设备设计图;(b) 实验设备实物图;(c)-(y) 覆盖率。研究方法(1)研究设计:选取泡沫板、PVC浮标、PP塑料瓶和木板四类典型海洋...
2026 - 06 - 01
研究背景在森林生态系统中,氮(N)和磷(P)是影响植物生长与养分循环的关键元素。树木获取养分主要依赖两种途径:一是通过细根从土壤中吸收,二是从衰老叶片中回收并再利用。前者代表外部获取,后者体现内部节约。二者之间的权衡,是植物维持养分稳态的重要策略。然而,在氮沉降增加和林分持续发育的背景下,不同林龄森林如何调整这种权衡,仍有待深入认识。近日,山西农业大学郭晋平老师团队在《BMC Plant Biology》期刊上发表的论文对此进行了深入探讨。研究团队以华北地区重要树种——油松(Pinus tabuliformis)为对象,系统揭示了林分发育与氮沉降交互作用下,树木氮磷利用策略的动态变化规律。 图1.研究区域。研究方法研究在山西关帝山森林区孝文山林场开展,选取了42年、55年和65年三个林龄的天然油松林分,设置5个氮添加水平(0、5、10、15、20 g N·m⁻²...
2026 - 06 - 01
研究背景毛竹(Phyllostachys edulis)是亚热带森林生态系统中的重要物种,兼具经济价值与生态功能。但单一毛竹林长期发展易面临土壤养分循环受限、地力下降和生产力衰退等问题。相比之下,毛竹—阔叶混交林有助于改善土壤环境、提升林分稳定性和生产力。但若缺乏有效管控,毛竹可通过地下茎快速扩张,改变群落结构并抑制阔叶树更新。由此,一个关键问题值得关注:毛竹入侵如何影响阔叶树的水分与养分获取,并维持二者的短暂共存?近期,南京林业大学的姜老师团队在《Catena》上发表了研究,团队以毛竹入侵麻栎(Quercus acutissima)阔叶林为对象,结合稳定氢氧同位素、根系生物量调查、土壤水分与养分分析,系统揭示了毛竹入侵过程中植物水分利用策略与地下生态位竞争机制。 图1.研究区样地设置及样点分布。研究方法研究设计:研究在长三角生态定位观测站进行,研究对象包括入侵样地中的毛竹和麻栎,以及未受...
2026 - 05 - 22
研究背景在全球变化研究中,河流、湖泊等内陆水体并非只是碳从陆地输送到海洋的通道,也是重要的碳转化与温室气体释放界面。进入水体的有机碳,一部分在水体中滞留埋藏,另一部分则通过微生物分解、厌氧产甲烷和气体扩散等过程转化为CO₂和CH₄,并释放到大气中。在快速城市化地区,土地利用变化、生活污水输入、河网改造和营养盐富集会进一步改变水体理化环境与碳循环过程。然而,不同类型城市水体的温室气体排放差异及其驱动机制仍有待明确。围绕这一问题,中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所程俊翔老师团队在国际期刊 《Science of the Total Environment》发表研究成果。研究以高度城市化地区苏州河湖系统为对象,开展 CH₄ 和 CO₂ 通量原位监测,并同步测定水体理化指标,系统揭示了不同类型城市水体温室气体排放的时空格局及主要驱动因素,为城市水体碳循环评估与排放管控提供了实测依据。 图1.苏州市土地...
关闭窗口】【打印
Copyright ©2018-2023 北京理加联合科技有限公司
犀牛云提供企业云服务

北京理加联合科技有限公司

地址:北京市海淀区安宁庄东路18号光华创业园5号楼(生产研发)
          光华创业园科研楼四层
电话:13910499761 13910124070  010-51292601
传真:010-82899770-8014
邮箱:info@li-ca.com
邮编:100085

 



 


 


  • 您的姓名:
  • *
  • 公司名称:
  • *
  • 地址:
  • *
  • 电话:
  • *
  • 传真:
  • *
  • 电子邮箱:
  • *
  • 邮政编码:
  • *
  • 留言主题:
  • *
  • 详细说明:
  • *
在线留言
关注我们
  • 官方微信
  • 官方手机端
友情链接:
X
1

QQ设置

3

SKYPE 设置

4

阿里旺旺设置

等待加载动态数据...

等待加载动态数据...

5

电话号码管理

  • 010-51292601
6

二维码管理

等待加载动态数据...

等待加载动态数据...

展开