北京理加联合科技有限公司

LICA United Technology Limited

服务热线: 13910499761 010-51292601
企业邮箱
应用支持 Application Support
News 应用支持

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

日期: 2019-03-19
浏览次数: 384

M.K. Maid1*

, R.R. Deshmukh2

1*Department of CS and IT, Dr. B. A. M. U, Aurangabad, India

2Department of CS and IT, Dr. B. A. M. U, Aurangabad, India

*Corresponding Author: mm915monali@gmail.com 

Available online at: www.ijcseonline.org 


Abstract— Remote Sensing has wide range of applications in many different fields. Remote Sensing has been found to be a valuable tool in evaluation, monitoring, and management of land, water and crop resources. The applications of remote sensing techniques in the field of agriculture are wide and varied ranging from crop identification, detection of disease on different crops & predicting grain yield of crops. Many remote sensing applications are devoted to the agricultural sector. The selected applications are put in the context of the global challenges the agricultural sector is facing: minimizing the environmental impact, while increasing production and productivity. The application of remote sensing in agriculture typically involves measuring reflectance of electromagnetic radiation in the visible (390 to 770 nm), near-infrared (NIR, 770 to 1,300 nm), or middle-infrared (1,300 to 2,500 nm) ranges using spectrometers. This paper reviews the concept of hyperspectral remote sensing, use of remote sensing in terms of agriculture field, study of diseased wheat leaves using hyperspectral remote sensing.


Keywords—Remote Sensing, Wheat Leaf Rust, Vegetation Indices, ASD Fieldspec4 Spectroradiometer.

I. INTRODUCTION

Remote sensing refers to the activities of  recording/observing/perceiving (sensing) objects or events at  far away (remote) places. Remote sensing is a sub-field of  geography. In modern usage, the term generally refers to the use of aerial sensor technologies to detect and classify objects on Earth (both on the surface, and in the atmosphere and oceans) by means of propagated signals (e.g. electromagnetic radiation) [1]. The electromagnetic radiation is normally used as an information carrier in remote sensing. The reflection of that energy by earth surface materials is then measured to produce an image of the area sensed. Generally, Remote sensing can be done on two types of data namely imagery and non imagery. It can be done using different kinds of remote sensing devices like ASD fieldspec Spectroradiometer. Remote sensing have wide range of applications in various fields, among which Agriculture plays important role in our day to day life as not only in india but in many countries agriculture is their primary source of income and all human beings, animals and many industries are dependent on agriculture field. agriculture plays key macroeconomic roles in the 

industrialization of developing countries by relieving saving, aggregate demand, fiscal, and foreign exchange constraints on the industrial sector [2].

 In agriculture field winter wheat is one of the highest yielding crops on the farm [3]. Different climatic factors and disease symptoms affects the plant growth and it directly results in yield of crop. Rust are among the most important 

fungal diseases of wheat worldwide [4]. There are three types of rust diseases in wheat crop: Strip Rust, Leaf Rust, Stem Rust.

Wheat rusts are caused by three related fungi [5]: 

• Stripe rust is caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici.

• Leaf rust is caused by Puccinia triticina.

• Stem rust is caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici.

This paper reviews the study of wheat leaf rust (WLR) disease using hyperspectral analysis, different vegetation indices and spectral signatures can be used to estimate the features of diseased and healthy crop. In this review paper ASD Fieldspec4 Spectroradiometer is used for data collection of diseased wheat leaves and healthy wheat leaves. Using different vegetation indices (VIs) biophysical and biochemical properties of crop can be estimated. 

II. BASICS OF REMOTE SENSING

Hyperspectral remote sensing is used for over 100 years for analysis of various objects and their chemical as well as biological composition. But hyperspectral sensor offers an alternate and nondestructive technique for analysis of 

physical and chemical properties of material. Remote sensing of vegetation is mainly performed by obtaining the electromagnetic wave reflectance information from canopies using passive sensors. It is well known that the reflectance of 

light spectra from plants changes with plant type, water content within tissues, and other intrinsic factors [6].

The reflectance from vegetation to the electromagnetic spectrum (spectral reflectance or emission characteristics of vegetation) is determined by chemical and morphological characteristics of the surface of organs or leaves [7]. 

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

The main applications for remote sensing of vegetation are based on the following light spectra: (i) the ultraviolet region (UV), which goes from 10 to 380 nm; (ii) the visible spectra, which are composed of the blue (450–495 nm), green (495−570 nm), and red (620–750 nm) wavelength regions; and (iii) the near and mid infrared band (850–1700 nm)[9,10].

III. HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING IN AGRICULTURE

Spectral data at the leaf and canopy scales have been utilized to improve the plant disease detection techniques from remotely sensed observations [11,12], where the visible and infrared regions are more sensitive to disease development [13]. The measured spectra can be utilized to early detection of fungus disease. Moreover, the optimized narrow bands vegetation indices were employed to discriminate various disease of wheat [14]. 

III.I Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease

The wheat rust is an important crop disease which has three types, i.e., wheat yellow rust (WYR), wheat leaf rust (WLR),and wheat stem rust [15]. 

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

WYR disease is identified by a single symptom which occurs as a narrow yellow stripes parallel to nervures on the leaf, whereas WLR disease is caused by the Puccinia triticina fungus and illustrates numerous symptoms simultaneously in various parts of an infected leaf [16]. The WLR symptoms vary from leaf to leaf but it presents a yellow color earlier, then its changes to orange and dark brown. Finally, the disease symptom ends with the dry leaf [17].

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

The effect of a disease on the pigments and structure of a plant and the change in their spectral responses enable spectroradiometry and remote sensing techniques to detect plant disease effectively [18].

Crop disease can cause significant yield loss and reduction of grain quality, which have a negative impact to food security around the world [19].

IV. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

IV.I Data Collection

Field spec 4 spectrometer (Analytical spectral device, ASD Co. USA) shown in following figure having parameter details in Table 1. Spectrum data export in ASCII text, then it can analyze spectrum data with different software like ASD View Spec Pro. Unscramble and MATLAB/ Octave [20].

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review


Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

V. VEGETATION INDICES FOR ESTIMATION OF WLRSYMPTOMS

Spectral data at different scales including leaf, canopy and landscape-level have been widely used to improve precision [21-24]. In recent years, researchers have studied various spectral vegetation indices (SVIs) to detect different 

vegetation diseases [24-26]. Efficient use of spectral data in detection of plant disease depends on the application. The spectral regions from 400 to 700 and 700 to 1100 are mainly influenced by leaf composition of pigments, structure, and 

water content [27]. The effect of a disease on the pigments and structure of a plant and the change in their spectral responses enable spectroradiometry and remote sensing techniques to detect plant disease effectively [28]. There are 

indices derived from reflectance values at several wavelengths that are able to detect and quantify the leaf content substances such as chlorophyll, anthocyanin, and water [29,30].

By using different types of vegetation indices estimation of biochemical and biophysical properties of crops is possible. Vegetation indices that are used by many researchers have shown in following table [31].


Table 2. Different Vegetation Indices

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

Hyperspectral Analysis of Wheat Leaf Rust (WLR) Disease: A Review

VI. CONCLUSION

As Remote Sensing technology growing rapidly in technological era and hyperspectral Remote sensing has wide number of applications not only in agriculture field but also in different industries which are dependent on agricultural area. With the help of different spectral characteristics like spectral signatures, vegetation indices, reflectance spectra we can use it for discrimination of crops. It can be used to study the severity of disease in crops, estimating the grain yield of crops, analysis and growth modulation of crop. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENT 

This work is supported by Dept. of Computer Science and Information Technology under the funds for Infrastructure under science and Technology (DST-FIST) with sanction no. SR/FST/ETI- 340/2013 to Dept. of Computer Science and Information Technology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India. The authors would like to thank Department and University Authorities for providing the infrastructure and necessary 

support for carrying out the research. 


REFERENCES

[1] A. Chitradevi, S. Vijayalakshmi, “Random Forest for Multitemporal and Multiscale Classification of Remote Sensing Satellite Imagery”, International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 4, Issue.2, pp.59-65, 2016.

[2] D. Souza, “Growth Complementarity Between Agriculture and Industry: Evidence from a Panel of Developing Countries”, 2014.

[3] G. Boyle, “The Winter Wheat Guide”, Teagasc, pp. 21-40, 2016.

[4] S. N. Wegulo, “Rust Diseases of Wheat”, NebGuide, 2012.

[5] S. Markell, G. Milus, R. Cartwright, J. Hedge, “Rust Diseases of Wheat”, Agriculture and natural resources.

[6] L. Chang, S. Peng-Sen, and Liu Shi-Rong, “A review of plant spectral reflectance response to water physiological changes,” Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 80–91, 2016.

[7] C. Zhang and J. M. Kovacs, “The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review,” Precision Agriculture, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 693–712, 2012.

[8] J. B Campbell, “Introduction to Remote Sensing”, Taylor and Francis, London, 1996. 

[9] H. R. Bin Abdul Rahim, M. Q. Bin Lokman, S. W. Harun, “Applied light-side coupling with optimized spiral-patterned zinc oxide nanorod coatings for multiple optical channel alcohol vapor sensing,” Journal of Nanophotonics, vol. 10, no. 3, Article ID 036009, 2016.

[10] B. A. Cruden, D. Prabhu, and R. Martinez, “Absolute radiation measurement in venus and mars entry conditions,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1069–1079, 2012.

[11] S. Sankaran, A. Mishra, R. Ehsani, and C. Davis, “A review of advanced techniques for detecting plant diseases,” Comput. Electron. Agriculture, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2010.

[12] C. Buschmann and E. Nagel, “In vivo spectroscopy and internal optics of leaves as basis for remote sensing of vegetation,” Int. J. Remote Sens, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 711–722, 1993.

[13] N. K. Poona and R. Ismail, “Using Boruta-selected spectroscopic wavebands for the asymptomatic detection of Fusarium circinatum stress,” IEEE J. Select. Topics Appl. Earth Observations Remote Sens., vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 3764–3772, 2014.

[14] W. Huang, “New optimized spectral indices for identifying and monitoring winter wheat diseases,” IEEE J. Select. Topics Appl. Earth Observations Remote Sens., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 2516–2524, 2014.

[15] M. D. Bolton, J. A. Kolmer, and D. F. Garvin, “Wheat leaf rust caused by Puccinia triticina,” Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 563–575, 2008.

[16] C. Robert, M.-O. Bancal, B. Ney, and C. Lannou, “Wheat leaf photosynthesis loss due to leaf rust, with respect to lesion development and leaf nitrogen status,” New Phytologist, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 227–241, 2005.

[17] D. Ashourloo, H. Aghighi, A. A. Matkan, M. R. Mobasheri, and A. M. Rad, “An Investigation Into Machine Learning Regression Techniques For The Leaf Rust Disease Detection Using Hyperspectral Measurement”, IEEE journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing, vol. 9, pp. 4344 – 4351, 2016.

[18] J.C. Zhang, R.L. Pu, J.H.Wang, W.J. Huang, L.Yuan, J.H. Luo, “Detecting powdery mildew of winter wheat using leaf level hyperspectral measurements”, Comput. Electron. Agric, pp. 13–23, 2012.

[19] R. N. Strange, P. R. Scott, “Plant Disease: A threat to global food security”, Annual reviews phytopathol, vol. 43, pp. 83-116, 2005.

[20] R. M. Misal, R. R. Deshmukh, “Application of Near-Infrared Spectrometer in Agro-Food Analysis: A Review”, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 141 No.7, pp. 0975 – 8887, 2016.

[21] H.D Roelofsen, P. M. van Bodegom, L. Kooistra, , J. P.M. Witte, “Trait estimation in herbaceous plant assemblages from in situ canopy spectra” Remote Sens., Vol. 5, pp. 6323–6345, 2013.

[22] S. Delalieux, A. Auwerkerken, V.W. Verstraeten, B. Somers, R.Valcke, S.Lhermitte, J. Keulemanss, P. Coppin, “Hyperspectral reflectance and fluorescence imaging to detect scab induced stress in Apple leaves”, Remote Sens, Vol. 1, pp. 858–874, 2009.

[23] U. Steiner, K. Bürling, E.C. Oerke, “Sensor use in plant protection”, Gesunde Pflanz, Vol. 60, pp. 131–141, 2008. 

[24] J.C. Zhang, R.L. Pu, J.H.Wang, W.J. Huang, L.Yuan, J .Wang, “Using in-situ hyperspectral data for detecting and discriminating yellow rust disease from nutrient stresse”,Field Crops Res., Vol. 134, pp.165–174,2012.

[25] C.Hillnhütter, A.K. Mahlein, R.A. Sikora, E.C. Oerke, “Remote sensing to detect plant stress induced by Heterodera schachtii and Rhizoctonia solani in sugar beet fields”, Field Crops Res., Vol. 122, pp. 70–77, 2011. 

[26] D. Moshou, C. Bravo, J. West, S. Wahlen, A. McCartney, H. Ramon, “Automatic detection of ―yellow rust‖ in wheat using reflectance measurements and neural networks”, Comput. Electron. Agric, Vol. 44, pp. 173–188, 2004.

[27] A.K. Mahlein, T. Rumpf, P. Welke, H.W. Dehne, L. Plümer, U. Steiner, E.C. Oerke, “Development of spectral indices for detecting and identifying plant diseases”, Remote Sens. Environ, Vol. 128, pp. 21–30, 2013. 

[28] J.C. Zhang, R.L. Pu, J.H.Wang, W.J. Huang, L. Yuan, J.H. Luo, “Detecting powdery mildew of winter wheat using leaf level13–23, 2012. 

[29] A.A. Gitelson, Y.J. Kaufman, R. Stark, D. Rundquist, “Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction”, Remote Sens. Environ, Vol.80, pp. 76–87, 2002. 

[30] J. Penuelas, F. Baret, I. Filella, “Semiempirical indices to assess carotenoids/chlorophyll a ratio from leaf spectral reflectance”, Photosynthetica, Vol. 31, pp. 221–230, 1995. 

[31] P. V. Janse, R. R. Deshmukh, “Hyperspectal Remote Sensing for Agriculture: A Review”, International Journal of Computer Applications,Vol.172 No.7, pp. 0975 – 8887, 2017.

[32] A. R. Huete, B. K. Liu, L. Van, “A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 59, pp. 440-451, 1997. 

[33] J.W. Rouse, R.H. Haas, J.A. Schell, D.W. Deering, “Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS, Third ERTS symposium”, NASA SP-351, NASA Washington, DC, Vol. 1, pp. 309-317, 1973. 

[34] C.F. Jorden, “Leaf area index from quality of light on the forest floor”, Ecology, Vol. 50(4), pp. 663-666, 1969. 

[35] B. Gao, “NDWI: A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 58, pp. 257-266, 1996. 

[36] J. Penuelas, J. Pinol, R. Ogaya, I. Lilella, “Estimation of plant water content by the reflectance water index WI (R900/ R970)”, International journal of remote sensing, Vol. 18, pp. 2869-2875, 1997. 

[37] Y. J. Kaufman, D. Tanier, “Atmospherically resistant vegetation index (ARVI) for EOS-MODIS”, IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 30(2), pp. 261-270, 1992. 

[38] A.R. Huete, “A soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 71, pp. 158-182, 2000. 

[39] A.A. Gitelson, Y. J. Kaufman, R. Stark, D. Rundquist, “Novel algorithm for remote estimation of vegetation fraction”, Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 80, pp. 76-87, 2002. 

[40] J. Penuelas, F. Baret, I. Filella, “Semi empirical indices to assess carotenoids/ chlorophyll a ratio from leaf spectral reflectance”, Photosynthetica, Vol. 31, pp. 221-230, 1995. 

[41] G. A. Blackburn, “Spectral indices for estimating photosynthetic pigment concentration: A test using senescent tree leaves”, International journal of remote sensing, Vol. 19, pp. 657-675, 1998. 

[42] G. A. Blackburn, “Quantifying chlorophyll and carotenoids from leaf to canopy scale: An evaluation of some hyperspectral approaches”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 66, pp. 273-285, 1998. 

[43] M. N. Merzlyak, A. A. Gitelson, O. B. Chivkunova, Y. Ratikin, “Nondestructive optical detection of pigment changes during leaf senescent and fruit ripening”, Physiologia Plantarum, Vol. 105, pp. 135-141, 1999. 

[44] M. S. Kim, “The use of narrow spectral bands for improving remote sensing estimation of fractionally absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fAPAR)”, Master Thesis, Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, 1994. 

[45] C. S. T. Daughtry, C. L. Walthall, M. S. Kim, E. B. de Colstoun, J. E. McMurtrey, “Estimating corn leaf chlorophyll concentration from leaf and canopy reflectance”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 74, pp. 229-239, 2000. 

[46] A. A. Gitelson, G. P. Keydan, M. N. Merzlyak, “Three band model for noninvasive estimation of chlorophyll, carotenoids and anthocyanin contents in higher plant leaves”, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 33, L11402, 2006. 

[47] A. A. Gitelson, M. N. Merzlyak, O. B. Chivkunova, “Optical properties and non-destructive estimation of anthocyanin content in plant leaves”, Photochemistry and Photobiology, Vol. 74(1), pp. 38-45, 2001. 

[48] J. A. Gaman, J. S. Surfus, “Assessing leaf pigment content and activity with a reflectometer”, New Phytologist, Vol. 143, pp. 105-117, 1999. 

[49] A. K. Van Den Berg, T. D. Perkins, “Non-destructive estimation of anthocyanin content in autumn auger maple leaves”, Horticultural Science, vol. 40(3), pp. 685-685, 2005. 

[50] A. A. Gitelson, Y. Zur, O. B. Chivkunova, M. N. Merzlyak, “Assessing carotenoid content in plant leaves with reflectance spectroscopy, Photochemistry and Photobiology, Vol. 75(3), pp. 272-281, 2002. 

[51] A. R. Hunt, B. N. Rock, “Detection of changes in leaf water content using near- and middle-infrared reflectance”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 30, pp. 43-54, 1989. 

[52] B. N. Rock, J. E. Vogelmann, D. L. Williams, A. F. Vogelmann, T. Hoshizaki, “Detection of forest damage”, BioScience, Vol. 36(7), pp. 439-445, 1986. 

[53] J. A. Gamon, L. Serrano, J. S. Surfus, “The photochemical reflectance index: An optical indicator of photosynthetic radiation-use efficiency across species, functional types, and nutrient level”, Oecologia, Vol. 112, pp. 492-501, 1997. 

[54] D. N. H. Horler, M. Dockray, J. Barber, “The red-edge of plant leaf reflectance”, International journal of remote sensing, Vol. 4, pp. 273-288, 1983. 




News / 相关新闻 More
2026 - 05 - 22
研究背景在全球变化研究中,河流、湖泊等内陆水体并非只是碳从陆地输送到海洋的通道,也是重要的碳转化与温室气体释放界面。进入水体的有机碳,一部分在水体中滞留埋藏,另一部分则通过微生物分解、厌氧产甲烷和气体扩散等过程转化为CO₂和CH₄,并释放到大气中。在快速城市化地区,土地利用变化、生活污水输入、河网改造和营养盐富集会进一步改变水体理化环境与碳循环过程。然而,不同类型城市水体的温室气体排放差异及其驱动机制仍有待明确。围绕这一问题,中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所程俊翔老师团队在国际期刊 《Science of the Total Environment》发表研究成果。研究以高度城市化地区苏州河湖系统为对象,开展 CH₄ 和 CO₂ 通量原位监测,并同步测定水体理化指标,系统揭示了不同类型城市水体温室气体排放的时空格局及主要驱动因素,为城市水体碳循环评估与排放管控提供了实测依据。 图1.苏州市土地...
2026 - 05 - 22
研究背景哈密瓜的风味品质和商品价值与甜度密切相关,而可溶性固形物含量(SSC)是评价果实甜度的重要指标。传统SSC检测多依赖折光仪测定,虽结果可靠,但需取样、榨汁或切片,具有破坏性,难以满足批量化、连续化和在线分选对快速无损检测的需求。高光谱成像技术融合了图像与光谱信息,能够间接反映果实内部化学成分(如糖、水分、酸度)的分布与含量,为非破坏性检测提供了新路径。然而,现有研究多集中于单一品种,跨品种检测的模型泛化能力仍面临挑战,尤其是哈密瓜这类果皮差异大、糖分分布不均的厚皮甜瓜。近日,青岛农业大学赵磊老师团队在《Symmetry》发表了一项研究,系统探索了高光谱成像结合机器学习在哈密瓜多品种可溶性固形物(SSC)无损检测中的应用,提出了一种基于RPD加权的集成模型,显著提升了跨品种预测的鲁棒性和准确性。 图1.光谱采集过程。研究方法样本准备:品种:西州蜜、伽师瓜、金凤凰、黑眉毛(各40个,共...
2026 - 05 - 18
研究背景全球气候变化正在改变干旱与半干旱草原生态系统的稳定性边界。随着年际降水波动增强、大气氮沉降加剧以及放牧压力持续存在,草原生态系统的稳定性正受到多重驱动因子的共同影响。物种丰富度(SR)和地上净初级生产力(ANPP)分别反映群落多样性与生态系统生产功能,二者之间的耦合关系被认为是评估草地稳定性和恢复力的重要生态学指标。然而,已有研究多关注单因子效应或静态气候条件下的生态响应,对于降水变异、放牧干扰和氮输入如何在不同降水年份中共同调控SR–ANPP耦合关系,仍缺乏系统认识。近期,兰州大学侯扶江老师和王晓波老师团队在《Earth's Future》上发表了一项研究,团队以黄土高原典型干旱草原为对象,探讨了不同降水年份下,放牧强度和氮添加如何影响SR与ANPP之间的耦合关系,并进一步解析了植物功能群和土壤因子在其中的调控机制。图1.长期放牧试验平台和氮添加试验区。UG、LG、MG和...
2026 - 05 - 18
研究背景松树枯萎病(PWD)是由松材线虫引发的毁灭性森林病害,具有传播快、致死率高和防控难度大的特点。当前防控多依赖病后治理,存在明显滞后性,难以满足早期预警需求。研究表明,PWD的发生发展与树体水分和叶绿素含量变化密切相关,二者可作为判断病害侵染程度的重要生理指标。然而,传统地面检测成本高、效率低,难以实现大范围、无损监测。近年来,随着光谱遥感技术的成熟,如何在病害无症状阶段实现早期识别,已成为防控研究的重点。然而,早期松树枯萎病的动态演变规律尚不明确,遥感监测的最佳时间窗口也缺乏系统性研究。近期,中国科学院空天信息创新研究院黄文江老师团队在《Ecological Informatics》发表了一项研究,研究通过构建“高光谱—色度—病理”多维监测框架,揭示了早期松树枯萎病的时间响应序列,并确定了遥感指标的最佳检测时机。 图1.研究区域概述。研究方法研究以安徽省宣城市麻姑山林场为研究区,选...
关闭窗口】【打印
Copyright ©2018-2023 北京理加联合科技有限公司
犀牛云提供企业云服务

北京理加联合科技有限公司

地址:北京市海淀区安宁庄东路18号光华创业园5号楼(生产研发)
          光华创业园科研楼四层
电话:13910499761 13910124070  010-51292601
传真:010-82899770-8014
邮箱:info@li-ca.com
邮编:100085

 



 


 


  • 您的姓名:
  • *
  • 公司名称:
  • *
  • 地址:
  • *
  • 电话:
  • *
  • 传真:
  • *
  • 电子邮箱:
  • *
  • 邮政编码:
  • *
  • 留言主题:
  • *
  • 详细说明:
  • *
在线留言
关注我们
  • 官方微信
  • 官方手机端
友情链接:
X
1

QQ设置

3

SKYPE 设置

4

阿里旺旺设置

等待加载动态数据...

等待加载动态数据...

5

电话号码管理

  • 010-51292601
6

二维码管理

等待加载动态数据...

等待加载动态数据...

展开